Using Google apps like Youtube or Google Docs with Safari is almost infuriating because it seems like Google purposely made the user experience worst. Conclusionīrowsing through any social media with Safari was clearly a worst experience and took more battery life from my mac. In which nowadays is the majority of websites. But this still at least proves that Safari is not going to save you more battery life on complex websites. The application of this test might not apply to some people. So in total Safari drained 6 percent more on my battery compared to Brave. While on Brave in 10 minutes it drained from 71 percent to 60 percent. On Safari, in 10 minutes it drained from 89 percent to 72 percent.
I ran the game for 10 minutes on both browsers. I had already predicted that Safari would do worst in battery life because I know Safari wouldn’t be optimized for any kind of animations and motion graphics. I ran an online game, Mope.io on both the Chromium-based Brave browser and Safari.
It has always been claimed that “Safari is the best for battery life.” But if most websites are not optimized for Safari, how then could Safari be good for battery life? So then I went in and conducted another experiment of my own. Safari might not actually save more battery lifeĪcross other media outlets. YouTube and GSuite applications have clearly been shown to be slow and animations to be choppy. Not to mention a known fact that Google purposely screwed over any other browser that is not running on Chromium for all their websites.
So unless all your doing is browsing Wikipedia articles, Safari is going to be slower than other browsers for any complex websites with many elements. And why should they? Most computers in the world are running on Windows, and Safari only accounts for 4 percent of the browser market share.
0 kommentar(er)
